🔗 Share this article

The count of guaranteed seats for Indigenous council members on New Zealand local authorities will be cut by more than half, following a controversial law change that required municipal councils to submit the fate of hard-earned Indigenous wards to a popular referendum.

Background Information on Indigenous Representation

Māori wards, which can include one or more councillors based on local population numbers, were created in 2001 to provide Māori electors the option to vote for a guaranteed Māori representative in municipal and provincial governments. Originally, local governments were only able to create a Indigenous seat by first submitting it to a community referendum in their area. Communities often devoted considerable time building community backing and urging their local governments to create Māori wards.

Policy Changes and Administrative Decisions

To remedy the issue, the previous Labour government allowed municipal authorities to establish a Indigenous seat without initially mandating them to subject it to a popular ballot.

However, this year, the right-wing coalition government overturned the policy, stating communities ought to determine whether to establish Indigenous representation.

Referendum Results

The coalition’s law change mandated councils that had established a electoral district under the previous policy to conduct decisive public votes alongside the local body elections, which ended on 11 October. Of 42 councils taking part in the public vote, 17 voted to retain their wards, and twenty-five to disestablish theirs – revealing many regions opposed to guaranteed Māori representation.

The results represented “a vital step in restoring community self-determination.”

Opposition parties nevertheless have condemned the new policy as “racist” and “anti-Māori”. Since taking office, the current administration has implemented extensive reversals to measures designed to enhance Indigenous welfare and political inclusion. Officials has said it aims to end “race-based” approaches, and says it is committed to enhancing results for Māori and every citizen.

Urban-Rural Divide

The results of the public votes were split down city-country divisions – six of the seven cities required to vote backed Māori wards, while countryside areas leaned strongly towards disestablishing them.

“It's unfortunate for the Indigenous seats that had recently been established – they’re just beginning to hit their stride.”

Voter Turnout and Criticism

The recent municipal polls recorded the smallest electoral participation in over three decades, with under one-third of eligible voters participating, leading to calls for an overhaul.

The process had been “a farce”.

Comparative Treatment

Councils are permitted to establish other types of wards – including countryside seats – without initially mandating a public vote. The different conditions applied to Māori wards indicated the government was targeting Indigenous inclusion.

“Ultimately, they were unsuccessful. Many communities have given the government a middle finger response.”

This remark concerned the 17 regions that chose to retain their seats.